![Study.com](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 334
- Просмотров 19 650 071
Study.com
США
Добавлен 29 ноя 2011
Breakthroughs start here! Use Study.com to access individualized resources designed to simplify learning and build confidence for learners and educators. Learn anything! We cover all subjects from Science, Social Studies and Math to Business, Career & Technical Education and much more.
Get help with homework, test prep, and earn college credit for less. Work with a tutor or learn at your own pace with self-directed resources.
K-12 teachers and schools use Study.com resources, quizzes, lesson plans, and other support to boost their classroom experience.
Parents take advantage of our comprehensive homeschool curriculum for their children.
Whatever your needs, we’re here to help you reach your academic goals.
#EdTech #OnlineLearning #Education #Breakthrough #StudyDotCom
Get help with homework, test prep, and earn college credit for less. Work with a tutor or learn at your own pace with self-directed resources.
K-12 teachers and schools use Study.com resources, quizzes, lesson plans, and other support to boost their classroom experience.
Parents take advantage of our comprehensive homeschool curriculum for their children.
Whatever your needs, we’re here to help you reach your academic goals.
#EdTech #OnlineLearning #Education #Breakthrough #StudyDotCom
Study.com: Warm Up To Greatness
Get your degree, pass your professional certification and open the doors to the life-changing impact of education.
The secret to getting ahead is getting started. Breakthroughs start here at Study.com!
#Education #Inspiration #StudentSuccess #Breakthroughs
The secret to getting ahead is getting started. Breakthroughs start here at Study.com!
#Education #Inspiration #StudentSuccess #Breakthroughs
Просмотров: 404
Видео
Study.com experiences, transformed by AI
Просмотров 42 тыс.4 месяца назад
Introducing a new experience that combines Study.com's educational expertise with Al and learning science to empower students and educators to overcome obstacles and achieve breakthrough moments. Follow Us On: Instagram - studydotcom Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/company/stud... Twitter - studydotcom Subscribe to our channel for other...
Study.com + ETS Praxis
Просмотров 1814 месяца назад
Study.com is proud to be the official partner of ETS Praxis. Together, we support prospective teachers on their journey to the classroom. Follow Us On: Instagram - studydotcom Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/company/stud... Twitter - studydotcom Subscribe to our channel for other study tips!
Study AI for Teachers
Просмотров 1224 месяца назад
Study.com's Study AI is designed to help teachers reduce the amount of time spent preparing lesson plans, so they can reclaim valuable time to lead the classroom and support students. Follow Us On: Instagram - studydotcom Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/company/stud... Twitter - studydotcom Subscribe to our channel for other study tips!
Study AI for Test Prep
Просмотров 1314 месяца назад
Study.com helps thousands of learners pass professional exams and earn certifications that transform their lives. Now, Study.com is leveraging the power of AI to provide additional support for students, including expert tutoring, personalized study plans, and progress tracking. Follow Us On: Instagram - studydotcom Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/c...
Study AI for College Students
Просмотров 1234 месяца назад
Study.com’s College Saver helps students save thousands on their degree and earn credit at their own pace. Now, Study.com is leveraging the power of AI to provide additional support for students, including personalized tutoring and academic coaching. Follow Us On: Instagram - studydotcom Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/company/stud... Twitter - twi...
Webinar: Spotting the Signs - Equipping Educators to Recognize and Respond to Mental Health Concerns
Просмотров 708Год назад
Join our panel of experts as we explore how high schools and higher education institutions can best support the mental health of their students as they navigate the college application process and enter college. Our prestigious guests will dive into common early indicators of students who are struggling and discuss important mental health concerns about which all educators should be aware! Foll...
Webinar: Back to the Future - Review, Rewind, Replenish for Learning Loss
Просмотров 456Год назад
Join Erin Gasper from Chartiers-Houston Jr./Sr. High School as she lays out their school-wide learning-loss prevention program. Erin’s team uses Study.com as one tool to help close learning gaps and prepare students for end-of-the-year testing! Follow Us On: Facebook - StudyDotCom Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/company/studydotcom Twitter - studydotcom Instagram - instagra...
Webinar: Carving a Pathway Forward - How CTE Teachers use Study.com
Просмотров 314Год назад
Join us and learn why 3 CTE teachers at Springs Charter Schools have adopted Study.com for their different pathways, how they benefit and use Study.com’s library with their classes, and more so, how it’s impacted their students! We’ll be further discussing how their CITE (they include internships) program has evolved over the years to achieve a combination of both College AND Career readiness i...
Webinar: Help Students Say Yes to the Right Test (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 238Год назад
Join Rachel Mead as she dives into college entrance exam test prep. With PSAT scores releasing on Dec 5 & 6, this timely session gives you tools and resources to offer students and parents the relationship between the PSAT, SAT, and ACT. This webinar will help you guide students toward the test for which they show a natural affinity. Check it out here! Follow Study.com on Social Media: Facebook...
Webinar: Tutoring - It Takes a Virtual Village (Higher Education Series)
Просмотров 254Год назад
Learn about Study.com's Virtual Village drop-in small group tutoring program that gives students access to the most engaging and qualified tutors around. Virtual Village serves the entire student with a strong focus on academic success, emotional well-being, and text anxiety strategies. We cover all academic subjects starting in 4th grade through college as well as standardized test prep and mu...
Webinar: Overcoming Students' Test Anxiety (Higher Education Series)
Просмотров 254Год назад
Do your students experience stress and anxiety around their teaching, nursing or other certification exams? Test anxiety is a real problem and can cause students to perform poorly, often creating a barrier to completing licensure and getting into the workforce. In this webinar, Study.com will provide strategies to alleviate test anxiety and increase confidence for your students, addressing ques...
Webinar: Demystifying Social and Emotional Learning (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 226Год назад
Join Megan Brown, licensed school psychologist and certified yoga instructor (RYT-200), in demystifying the concept of social-emotional learning; we’ll explore how SEL shouldn’t be an afterthought or a buzz word addition but instead represents the crux of successful teaching and learning - for all people, at all ages. Hosted by Megan Brown, Licensed School Psychologist! Follow Study.com on Soci...
Webinar: The Science Behind Microlearning (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 578Год назад
Webinar: The Science Behind Microlearning (Educators on Education Series)
Webinar: Holding Kids Accountable and Present (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 184Год назад
Webinar: Holding Kids Accountable and Present (Educators on Education Series)
Webinar: Implementing Study.com for All Subjects (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 305Год назад
Webinar: Implementing Study.com for All Subjects (Educators on Education Series)
Webinar: Introducing Skills from Study.com! (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 197Год назад
Webinar: Introducing Skills from Study.com! (Educators on Education Series)
Webinar: Getting Started with Study.com! (Educators on Education Series)
Просмотров 636Год назад
Webinar: Getting Started with Study.com! (Educators on Education Series)
Earn College Credit Online | EdTech Testimonial | Study.com
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.2 года назад
Earn College Credit Online | EdTech Testimonial | Study.com
Teacher Certification Testimonial | Study.com
Просмотров 1 тыс.2 года назад
Teacher Certification Testimonial | Study.com
Hydroponic Farming - Growing Plants Without Soil | Nature & Science Facts (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.2 года назад
Hydroponic Farming - Growing Plants Without Soil | Nature & Science Facts (According to Study.com)
Extreme Weather Facts and Trivia | Nature and Weather (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.2 года назад
Extreme Weather Facts and Trivia | Nature and Weather (According to Study.com)
Weather and Temperature Trivia | Nature & Weather Facts (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 8232 года назад
Weather and Temperature Trivia | Nature & Weather Facts (According to Study.com)
Calculating Tip on Your Bill - Tipping Tips | Math in Everyday Life (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 5 тыс.2 года назад
Calculating Tip on Your Bill - Tipping Tips | Math in Everyday Life (According to Study.com)
Powerball Chances- Your Odds of Winning the Lottery | Math in Everyday Life (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.2 года назад
Powerball Chances- Your Odds of Winning the Lottery | Math in Everyday Life (According to Study.com)
Job Interview Tips and FAQs | Career Guidance (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 7092 года назад
Job Interview Tips and FAQs | Career Guidance (According to Study.com)
Starting A New Career | Highest Paying Entry Level Jobs (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 8912 года назад
Starting A New Career | Highest Paying Entry Level Jobs (According to Study.com)
401k and Retirement Funds | Employer Investment Accounts (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 4392 года назад
401k and Retirement Funds | Employer Investment Accounts (According to Study.com)
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency | Decentralized Financial Markets Education (According to Study.com)
Просмотров 5162 года назад
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency | Decentralized Financial Markets Education (According to Study.com)
Money, Stocks, and Bonds - Differences in Financial Assets (According to Study.com...)
Просмотров 7182 года назад
Money, Stocks, and Bonds - Differences in Financial Assets (According to Study.com...)
Beef>corn💯
Even though the video is not the complete lesson, it is already very useful in the sense of timbre descriptors it provides. Thank you.
Who’s teacher used this as an Edpuzzle 😭😭
Wow you are so incredible! Now it all make sense thank you!!!
Moral Sciece
Ezzz
ditto.
Interesting
Mental health awareness among educators is absolutely essential. By openly discussing this topic, we're creating a supportive environment for teachers to recognize signs of distress in their students. Early intervention is key, and providing teachers with the tools they need can make a huge difference.
I love the emphasis on consistent effort in "Warm Up to Greatness." It's a powerful reminder that success isn't about sudden bursts of brilliance but persistent dedication. Education is a cornerstone, but life experiences are the mortar that holds it all together.
An Abrupt - Ending, Leave's One in Suspense!!!
People that say that this is wrong, reamber he says using pemdas. Without it it would be 1
Just here doing my job. Thanks for sharing! 🎉
I think there is a false dichotomy. They are two sides of a coin. They compliment and not contrafict each other
anyone watching this during summer bc honors biology
Update?
Thanks for helping me
I always thought you had to do what was in parenthesis first. So 8/2(4) would be 1. So confusing.
Parentheses group and give priority to operations INSIDE the symbol not outside the symbol. 2(4) is not a parenthetical priority and is mathematically the same as 2×4 When there are no OPERATIONS left INSIDE the parentheses to evaluate you can remove the parentheses and replace with an explicit multiplication symbol or leave them to represent implicit multiplication which is simply multiplication without the need for a physical multiplication sign...
The very first letter is parentheses. You have to do everything that has to do with parentheses first because you need to get rid of them in order to continue on through the equation. The answer is 1.
P is for inside parentheses only, not outside. Otherwise you run into the 4²(3) problem. How do you do P before E here?
Who said? Like why put the letters in order only to say don’t follow the order? Makes no sense.
The order of operations like PEMDAS etc. are oversimplifications for what's really allowed when simplifying anyway. Understanding grouping and different strengths of it is more useful. Take 4 + 3²×6/2 - 4 You could follow it literally: E: 4 + 9×6/2 - 4 M: 4 + 54/2 - 4 D: 4 + 27- 4 A: 31 - 4 S: 27 However, in this example you could do: S: 0 + 3²×6/2 D: 3²×3 E: 9×3 M: 27 Same correct answer and just as valid. Shorter too in this example. + and - have the weakest grouping power. × and ÷ have stronger grouping power than + and -. Exponents have higher grouping power again. Parentheses have the highest grouping power. Depending on what you have and how they are laid out let's you simplify in different ways. Minutephysics did a short video called The Order of Operations is wrong. Worth a watch.
6 letter acronym that represents 4 levels not 6 exact steps... P E M&D equally left to right as they appear A&S equally left to right as they appear
I got 6.... and I was confused adleast I know why I didn't finish high school ;P I'm stupid. for those confused my logic: 8/2(2+2) is 8/4+4... which made 6... ;P well adleast I made you day I hope.
I love that how you explain the romance very sweatly by making the eyes,face and a silent smile combination of,indeed you looked very romantic,a very distinctive style. stay happy !!!
Mathematician answer or the CORRECT answer is one " 1 "...... Please Stop trying to change what is correct.... PEMDAS is a JOKE
Your comment is a joke. The correct answer when you actually understand and apply the Order of Operations and the various properties and axioms of math correctly as intended is 16 not 1
@@RS-fg5mf You do PEMDAS and continue to be mocked around the world, while I will continue to answer math equations correctly ..... Have a nice day.
@@strictlyaesthetic9202 I don't do PEMDAS but you definitely do dmba$$ ... It's not an equation, it's an expression and the only people mocking 16 are the mathematically incompetent like you...
Greetings! I recently stumbled upon your Udemy course and I must say, it's truly impressive! I am thrilled to have the opportunity to work with you and help you devise custom-made strategies to increase enrollments, generate positive reviews, and drive sales. It would be great to connect and discuss further details. Looking forward to hearing back from you! Best regards.
I didn't expect it to end that fast
So if it’s a fraction you don’t simplify it ?
8 -------(2+2)= 8÷2(2+2)= 16 2 8 ---------- = 8÷(2(2+2))= 1 2(2+2)
did it just cut off?
8÷2(2+2) 8÷2(4) 4(4) =16 its BODMAS for the ones who dont know and the bracket simply means multiply here its just there to get things complicated And also I am sorry If I said anything wrong
people say that math is tying to simplify things but this overly complicates them THE GAS STATION EXAMPLE IS STRAIGHT UP MULTIPLICATION
ruclips.net/video/lLCDca6dYpA/видео.htmlsi=nFglV2Rze8mt-XwB If you stopped paying attention in math class after 6 grade, you will arrive at 16. PEMDAS isn't the only tool used in mathematics. It's for grade school math
This is grade school arithmetic numpty... You're mathematically ignorant if you didn't get 16 as the correct answer.... Basic Arithmetic doesn't change after 4th grade Dunning-Kruger
It's simply ambiguous notation. A trick. Academically, multiplication by juxtaposition implies grouping but the programming/literal interpretation does not. That's the issue. You can't prove either answer since it comes from notation conventions, not any rules of maths. Wolfram Alpha's Solidus article mentions the a/bc ambiguity and modern international standards like ISO-80000-1 mention about division on one line with multiplication or division directly after and that brackets are required to remove ambiguity. Even over in America where the programming interpretation is more popular, the American Mathematical Society stated it was ambiguous notation too. Multiple professors and mathematicians have said so also like: Prof. Steven Strogatz, Dr. Trevor Bazett, Dr. Jared Antrobus, Prof. Keith Devlin, Prof. Anita O'Mellan (an award winning mathematics professor no less), Prof. Jordan Ellenberg, David Darling, Matt Parker, David Linkletter, Eddie Woo etc. Even scientific calculators don't agree on one interpretation or the other. Calculator manufacturers like CASIO have said they took expertise from the educational community in choosing how to implement multiplication by juxtaposition and mostly use the academic interpretation. Just like Sharp does. TI who said implicit multiplication has higher priority to allow users to enter expressions in the same manner as they would be written (TI knowledge base 11773) so also used the academic interpretation. TI later changed to the programming interpretation but when I asked them were unable to find the reason why. A recent example from another commenter: Intermediate Algebra, 4th edition (Roland Larson and Robert Hostetler) c. 2005 that while giving the order of operations, includes a sidebar study tip saying the order of operations applies when multiplication is indicated by × or • When the multiplication is implied by parenthesis it has a higher priority than the Left-to-Right rule. It then gives the example 8 ÷ 4(2) = 8 ÷ 8 = 1 but 8 ÷ 4 • 2 = 2 • 2 = 4 This is just cluckbait like all the other videos picking a side when there is no correct side.
Lol, NOPE! Literally the ONLY answer to this is 1. It's time for you to admit that PEDMAS is a broken way to teach. Distributive method clearly shows the answer is 1 and can only be 1.
The Distributive Property supports 16 not 1 .... How does it feel to be less mathematically intelligent than your average 4th grade 10 year old??
How did you get to that page to search for the institutions?????
how can you be a teacher and wrong haha
He's not wrong.... Numpty The majority of MATH BOOKS support 16 The majority of scientific calculators and online math engines support 16 Every Math Teacher I know personally, several of whom have PhDs in math and teach at Universities support 16. Stop embarrassing yourself and get a clue...
The problem is never the problem. Mum should buy a lower child sized table for her son, pour the required amount of milk he needs for his cereal into a small plastic jug that is more manageable for a small child, instead of a heavy 2 lt bottle, and have them placed on his table to do himself. The problem is not the child, the problem is never the problem. Educate the parent and you will change the behaviour of the child.
No, I’m pretty sure 1 is correct due to juxtapositioning. 8/2(2+2) can be easily written as: n= 2+2 8/2n In this context you would always solve for 2n first before division with the 8.
WRONG.... People confuse and conflate two different types of Implicit multiplication .... One without a delimiter and one with a delimiter.. Type 1... Implicit Multiplication between a coefficient and variable... A special relationship given to coefficients and variables that are directly prefixed i.e. juxstaposed WITHOUT a delimiter and forms a composite quantity by Algebraic Convention... Example 2y or BC This type of Implicit Multiplication is given priority over Division and most other operations but not all other operations... This can be seen in most Algebra text books or Physics book. Physics uses this type of Implicit Multiplication quite heavily.. Type 2... Implicit Multiplication between a TERM and a Parenthetical value that have been juxstaposed without an explicit operator but WITH a delimiter...The parentheses serve to delimit the two sub-expressions.. Parenthetical implicit multiplication. The act of placing a constant, variable or TERM next to parentheses without a physical operator. The multiplication SYMBOL is implicit, implied though not plainly expressed, meaning you multiply the constant, variable or TERM with the value of the parentheses or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression. Parentheses group and give priority to operations WITHIN the symbol of INCLUSION not outside the symbol. Terms are separated by addition and subtraction not multiplication or division. The axiom for the Distributive Property is a(b+c)= ab+ac but what most people fail to understand is that each of those variables represents a constant value OR a set of operations that represent a constant value... A single TERM expression like 6÷2(1+2) has two sub-expressions. The single TERM sub-expression 6÷2 juxstaposed to the two TERM parenthetical sub-expression 1+2. The lack of an explicit operator implies multiplication between the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses and the parenthetical value or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression... The parentheses DELIMIT the TERM 6÷2 from the two TERMS 1+2 maintaining comparison and contrast between the two elements... Implicit multiplication is always by juxstaposition but not all juxstaposition is Implicit multiplication. Example 2½ = 2.5 not 2 times ½... There is “implicit multiplication” WITH delimiters and there is “implicit multiplication WITHOUT delimiters. Two different types of Implicit multiplication and mathematically different. 6÷2y the 2y has no delimiter.... 6÷2y=3÷y by Algebraic Convention. 6÷2(a+b) has a delimiter... 6÷2(a+b)= 3a+3b by the Distributive Property... 6y÷2y = 6y÷(2y) = 6y÷(2*y) 6y÷2(y)= (6y÷2)(y)= 6y÷2*y 6y÷2y(y)= (6y÷(2y))(y)= 6y÷(2y)*y= 6y÷(2*y)*y ÷2y the denominator is 2y ÷2(y) the denominator is 2
No, I’m pretty sure 1 is correct due to multiplication juxtapositioning. 8/2(2+2) can be easily written as: n= 2+2 8/2n In this context you would always solve for 2n first before division with the 8.
why don't you do it backward Let's say a/2(2+2)=16 a/2(4)=16 a/8=16 a=16x8 a=128 is not equal to 8!!! now let's do a/2(2+2)=1 a/2(4)=1 a/8=1 a=8x1 a=8 which matches the given equation so the correct answer obviously should be 1!
That doesn't prove anything as the ambiguity is caused by notation conventions. Academically, juxtaposition implies grouping and multiplication (1) Literally/programming-wise, juxtaposition implies multiplication only (16) Whichever convention you choose will put you on the path for the respective answer. You chose the academic interpretation so any "proof" of yours will of course give 1 as it's predetermined. It's called a circular argument, which can't prove anything obviously.
You fail at basic arithmetic and you fail at basic algebra... a/2(2+2)=16 a/2(4)=16 a/2=16/4 a/2=4 2×4=a a=8 a/2(2+2)=1 a/2(4)=1 a/2=1/4 2×(1/4)=a a= 1/2
@@RS-fg5mf lol I think you are the one that fail at basic Algebra, do you know the rule of expanding bracket? 2(2+2) should be treated as whole
@@userun-j1u you FAIL to understand the Distributive Property correctly.... The Distributive Property is a PROPERTY of Multiplication NOT Parentheses and not Parenthetical Implicit Multiplication. As such it has the same priority as Multiplication and Multiplication does not have priority over Division. The Distributive Property is congruent with the Order of Operations it doesn't supercede the Order of Operations... The Order of Operations work because of the Properties and Axioms of math not in spite of them... The Distributive Property when fully applied is an act of ELIMINATING the need for parentheses by drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out not by drawing factors in... If you can't draw a factor in and get the same result as drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out then you haven't applied the Distributive Property correctly... The Distributive Property does NOT change or cease to exist because of parenthetical implicit multiplication... The axiom a(b+c)= ab+ac however the variable "a" represents the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses not just a numeral next to the parentheses. In this case a = 8÷2 OR 4. People just automatically assume that "a" is a single numeral... A variable can represent a single value, a set of operations that represent a TERM that represents a single value or a solution set... 8÷2(2+2)= 8÷2×2+8÷2×2 Distributive Property.. Parentheses removed... 8÷(2(2+2))= 8÷(2×2+2×2) Distributive Property. Inner parentheses REMOVED
@@RS-fg5mf Expanding brackets means multiplying everything inside the bracket by the letter or number outside the bracket. For example, in the expression 3 ( m + 7 ) both m and 7 must be multiplied by 3: 3 ( m + 7 ) = 3 × m + 3 × 7 = 3 m + 21. in this scenerio, it is 2(2+2)=4+4=8, you don't do divsion before the expanding bracket is completed, you failed to understand this...
I think they meant this video as a tutorial in order for people to buy they paid course or something, but they could have had an outro or something Orr an actual plea to buy the course 😂
That cutoff was funny. So fking random 😂
i must have mesoamerican ancestry, i was born in sps, cortes, honduras :D, we still have words like palenque and sula :D
Anyone who uses ÷ instead of / in algebra should just stop doing math. When using / you can literally turn it into a fraction. Once you turn 8/2(2+2) into a fraction you HAVE to solve 2(2+2) first on the bottom of the fraction because 8 has nothing to multiply or divide by in the top half of the fraction. Therefore it becomes 8/8 in fractional terms, which =1. Think of it this way. I have 8 apples that I have to divide evenly between two groups of 2 guys and 2 girls. This results in the following equation: 8(apples)÷2[groups](2[males]+2[females]) or 8÷2(2+2). That means you give 1 apple to each person. You can’t just magically make 120 more apples appear and give each of them 8
Wrong and willfully ignorant... 8 -----(2+2)= 8÷2(2+2)= 16 2 8 --------- = 8÷(2(2+2))= 1 2(2+2) FYI... This isn't Algebra, it's basic grade school ARITHMETIC and there is no mathematical difference between the obelus ÷ and the solidus / they both serve as equal signs of division and neither one serves as a grouping symbol. The vinculum (horizontal fraction bar) serves as a grouping symbol...
Can someone show this to the Supreme Court?
Nah. Even if I take this as a fraction, it should be parentheses first and that 2 in front of parentheses is part of it, so I have to multiply 2 by (2+2) and finally divide 8 by this result. Which is 1.
WRONG....
@@RS-fg5mf because?
@@petrkapitola2169 because when you actually understand and apply the Order of Operations and the various properties and axioms of math correctly as intended you get the only correct answer 16...
@@petrkapitola2169 The Distributive Property is a PROPERTY of Multiplication NOT Parentheses and not Parenthetical Implicit Multiplication. As such it has the same priority as Multiplication and Multiplication does not have priority over Division. The Distributive Property is congruent with the Order of Operations it doesn't supercede the Order of Operations... The Order of Operations work because of the Properties and Axioms of math not in spite of them... The Distributive Property when fully applied is an act of ELIMINATING the need for parentheses by drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out not by drawing factors in... If you can't draw a factor in and get the same result as drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out then you haven't applied the Distributive Property correctly... The Distributive Property does NOT change or cease to exist because of parenthetical implicit multiplication... The axiom a(b+c)= ab+ac however the variable "a" represents the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses not just a numeral next to the parentheses. In this case a = 8÷2 OR 4. People just automatically assume that "a" is a single numeral... A variable can represent a single value, a set of operations that represent a TERM that represents a single value or a solution set... 8÷2(2+2)= 8÷2×2+8÷2×2 Distributive Property.. Parentheses removed... 8÷(2(2+2))= 8÷(2×2+2×2) Distributive Property. Inner parentheses REMOVED
@@petrkapitola2169 People confuse and conflate two different types of Implicit multiplication .... One without a delimiter and one with a delimiter.. Type 1... Implicit Multiplication between a coefficient and variable... A special relationship given to coefficients and variables that are directly prefixed i.e. juxstaposed WITHOUT a delimiter and forms a composite quantity by Algebraic Convention... Example 2y or BC This type of Implicit Multiplication is given priority over Division and most other operations but not all other operations... This can be seen in most Algebra text books or Physics book. Physics uses this type of Implicit Multiplication quite heavily.. Type 2... Implicit Multiplication between a TERM and a Parenthetical value that have been juxstaposed without an explicit operator but WITH a delimiter...The parentheses serve to delimit the two sub-expressions.. Parenthetical implicit multiplication. The act of placing a constant, variable or TERM next to parentheses without a physical operator. The multiplication SYMBOL is implicit, implied though not plainly expressed, meaning you multiply the constant, variable or TERM with the value of the parentheses or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression. Parentheses group and give priority to operations WITHIN the symbol of INCLUSION not outside the symbol. Terms are separated by addition and subtraction not multiplication or division. The axiom for the Distributive Property is a(b+c)= ab+ac but what most people fail to understand is that each of those variables represents a constant value OR a set of operations that represent a constant value... A single TERM expression like 6÷2(1+2) has two sub-expressions. The single TERM sub-expression 6÷2 juxstaposed to the two TERM parenthetical sub-expression 1+2. The lack of an explicit operator implies multiplication between the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses and the parenthetical value or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression... The parentheses DELIMIT the TERM 6÷2 from the two TERMS 1+2 maintaining comparison and contrast between the two elements... Implicit multiplication is always by juxstaposition but not all juxstaposition is Implicit multiplication. Example 2½ = 2.5 not 2 times ½... There is “implicit multiplication” WITH delimiters and there is “implicit multiplication WITHOUT delimiters. Two different types of Implicit multiplication and mathematically different. 6÷2y the 2y has no delimiter.... 6÷2y=3÷y by Algebraic Convention. 6÷2(a+b) has a delimiter... 6÷2(a+b)= 3a+3b by the Distributive Property... 6y÷2y = 6y÷(2y) = 6y÷(2*y) 6y÷2(y)= (6y÷2)(y)= 6y÷2*y 6y÷2y(y)= (6y÷(2y))(y)= 6y÷(2y)*y= 6y÷(2*y)*y ÷2y the denominator is 2y ÷2(y) the denominator is 2
who is team 16 like my comment